About Me

Name: Marvin Wiebener
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

Cheney's Tortured Logic??

Jonathan Alter titled his most recent article in the June 14 issue of Newsweek, Cheney’s Tortured Logic. The story is about enhanced interrogation techniques—that’s benign politicolegaleze for torture. Alter actually says in the article that Eric Holder the US Attorney General is wrong for assigning a federal prosecutor to delve into the matter, which I wholeheartedly agree with and have said so in previous blogs and to my wife, when she’ll listen. My criticism of Alter is that I think he added gratuitous spice to the article in order to sell it to Newsweek. Controversy sells magazines, therefore the tweaks that were sure to draw applause and consternation at the same time. If you didn’t have an opportunity to read what I’m referring to here they are, followed by my consternation-revealing remarks. And I quote:

          “Two words jumped out at me from Cheney’s Fox News interview last week. Chris Wallace asked, “So even in those cases where CIA interrogators went beyond the specific legal authorization, you’re OK with it?” Cheney answered, “I am.” Alter says in his article to that, “That unadorned ‘I am’ was terrifying.”

          Please, Mr. Alter, terrifying? I think not. There are many of us who believe Cheney simply puts words and actions, no matter how unpopular, to how we feel. I do not engage in conversations promoting the torture of known terrorists that may have information critical to saving the lives of innocent people. However, have no doubt, if it were my responsibility to save one innocent I’d torture until I got verifiable information. Call me immoral, some would. Call me a hero, some would do that too but be assured I wouldn’t indulge in debate over the morality of such an act while waiting for a bomb to explode. Neither would Cheney. What would you call Cheney, Mr. Alter, if he authorized, condoned, encouraged, participated in the torture of someone who had foreknowledge of an event that would most certainly injure or even kill one of your family members?

          Secondly, Mr. Alter said, “As much as I’d like to see Cheney frog-marched out of Jackson Hole and sent to prison…” My problem with this remark is Alter’s apparent lack of respectful decorum when speaking of a former elected official who spent the better part of his life serving the USA. And frog-marched out of Jackson Hole, wouldn’t that be humiliating and possibly torturous? Many legal scholars as well as political ethicists would find that extremely unreasonable and bordering on criminal. Frog-marched, that sounds terrifying.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Torture and Who Knew

 The issue of torture, not long ago, was front page material prompting the usual, tiresome conflicts between political parties and, therefore, bringing out the worst in both. The blame game running amuck, the holier than thou, self-righteous and self-proclaimed keepers of our ethical and moral standards are screaming foul. Why? For obvious reasons, namely that using the legislative bully-pulpit to strike a cord with their constituents makes good sense at election time, mainly. And having a constituency of uninformed and enchanted (a new political term born out of the publics Obama obsession) only encourages the false hope and false belief that humanity will straighten up and fly right. If we don't torture under any circumstances the US will become pure of heart and lead the world in overcoming humanities penchant for evil. This isn't possible unless the world's population submits to a lobotomy. All those willing form a line at your nearest neuro-surgicenter.

Just a few weeks ago Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi denied ever being told that the CIA was waterboarding, an aggressive interrogation technique she (and others) say is torture. Ms. Pelosi is front and center when it comes to those fitting the self-righteous profile mentioned earlier in this article. Charles Krauthammer in his commentary on this subject last Friday said it best. Of Madam Speaker he said this (paraphrased): "When the CIA told Pelosi and other members of the House Intelligence Committee that waterboarding would be used she said nothing, did not raise concerns or voice dissapproval at any level. That makes her self-righteous condemnation not just cowardly but hollow." Krauthammer, in the same article, makes his case for the two times torture, in his opinion, is permissable. Read the entire commentary, it is thought provoking and enlightening.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Intelligence Gathering: A Hazard to Your Health

A hazard to your career if you work for a government intelligence agency collecting raw data for the purpose of analysis. The collecting continuum (colcon) isn't a straightforward, step-by-step process as some would like it to be. Instead it is circuitous, influenced at the many twists the continuum takes by unknowable factors. The President, legislators, ethicists, think-tanks, religious leaders--pundits of all shapes and sizes have been trying to nail this jello to the wall for decades. Lets apply the colcon to knowledge authorities believe a captured terrorist may have. If we believe he/she has information that might lead authorities to a growing cell of like-minded individuals with mischief on their agenda the technique used in securing as much verifiable information as possible will most likely be of the low-impact variety. Time may not be a critical issue. On the other hand at the far end of the colcom a terrorist that has foreknowledge of an immenant strike leading to the certain death of people a more aggressive approach is warranted. Many are concerned, that being their right, that these techniques are too aggressive, crossing the line, they say, and torturing the terrorist. "It is wrong, even terrorists' have rights!" people shout and wave signs supporting what they call human rights. This is an issue, like abortion, that has no easy answer for everyone. There will always be those apposed to aggressive forms of interrogation and the opposite is true as well. If the majority want the laws changed or at least tightened let it be done now and the new policy be applied to future interrogation events. But please, Mr. President, do not make charges and penalties retroactive. That not only is poor judgement it will undermine confidence in the government even more than it is presently.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »