I refuse to talk more about the US Attorney General Eric Holder and his misguided attempt to reconcile Bush-era interrogation methods via the investigation and possible prosecution of CIA operatives. However, I will say the act of appointing a federal prosecutor in and of itself is a strike—intentional or not—at the heart of what keeps America secure.

The espionage void began shortly after the Berlin wall fell. Russia, or what was left of it, was no longer seen as a great threat. Nuclear weapons were de-commissioned; nuclear non-proliferation was on the uptake. All of a sudden the nuclear armed countries had all these expensive and technically complicated rockets that were no longer needed. An effort began then to disarm, and with disarmament came downsizing of various intelligence gathering agencies. Fear of instant annihilation was set aside as a reasonable issue for consideration at another time. And at that point or somewhere close to that point the baby was thrown out with the bath water. If these big threats, we were thinking, were no longer as concerning then why spend billions on spying-information collection and analysis? It made no sense, besides that we needed money for other things.

This was a clear bi-partisan error committed under Reagan and Bush 41 and carried over into the Clinton era. The difference being that Reagan and Bush valued the contributions made by those agencies and Mr. Clinton didn’t. Bill Clinton had, at best, distain for them and dismantled them during his presidency. He even apparently ignored warnings from those agencies that further attacks against US interests overseas were eminent.  In addition to the first World Trade Center bombing in `93, there were the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, Embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen. To be fair I should mention that President Clinton vowed to hunt the culprits down and bring them to justice, but was hindered in the attempt to do a thorough job by a number of legitimate factors. There is also a good chance the Monica Lewinsky scandal had a deleterious effect on the president’s judgment at the time. At least it would have mine.

Now, after a disastrous eight years trying to reorganize and repair our country—after 9/11 and two wars—we find ourselves needing quality intelligence as much as we did during the cold-war. Instead of our government providing support to the CIA, political and otherwise, the attorney general wants to expose the ugly side of something (espionage) we all know exits. This looks and smells to me like one of those back room hidden agendas you hear about from the far left and far right conspiracy kooks. You don’t suppose I’m being influenced by those kooks do you?

I promised to continue the blog topic of last week, SPYING: What Will Obama Do?, but I’m now even more concerned about Attorney General Eric Holder and his intent on investigating Bush-era interrogation tactics, so we’ll return to Spying later.

Ladies and Gentlemen, friends and readers of this blog according to an article by Greg Miller and Josh Meyer written August 9, 2009 Mr. Holder is on the verge of naming a federal investigator. The question becomes is this the right move for the US?  No, I say absolutely not.  You might wonder why I’m so emphatic. As some of you know I’m not an expert on interrogation methods or the laws that govern their usage.  I am an interested citizen of the US that not only has the right to proffer my opinion but the obligation to do so, especially in the face of an impending injustice.  The Bush-era interrogation tactics investigation is the impending injustice I’m referring to.

Ask yourself why are we investigating, so that we can point at Bush and his administration with the finger of contempt and righteous indignation?  Or maybe we will find al Qaeda innocent of murdering three-thousand innocent non-combatants.  Some believe we will expose the evil within the CIA, DOD.  Let me say this to that belief, I can find evil in your hometown church, in any college and cookie manufacturer in the US—in other words, evil is everywhere.  Now ask yourself this, is it absolutely evil, absolutely un-lawful, absolutely un-ethical and immoral to torture the hell out of someone if there is a good chance they have information that could save one American life.  I believe it isn’t absolute and therefore the end justifies the means.  Let’s move on with new and improved interrogation methods, let’s implement the ones we already have.  Let’s thank Bush and the interrogators for keeping the US safe from attacks since September 11, 2001 and move on.  What will we benefit if the government spends millions of dollars, countless man-hours, and ruining reputations in the process?  Those citizens, the results of this investigation will be released to, are probably still in diapers, and the likelihood of them giving a damn is remote.